Blog | Expert advice on Building Maintenance & Compliance Standards | SFG20

What is Reactive Maintenance? | SFG20

Written by Nikola Towell | Apr 26, 2024 4:39:48 PM

If you're delving into maintenance strategies for the first time, you may be feeling overwhelmed. There are numerous approaches to choose from and it can be hard to know where to begin. 

As the industry standard for building maintenance, SFG20 has been creating guidance to inform maintenance strategies for over 30 years - so if you've come for practical maintenance advice, you're in the right place!

In this article, you will learn what reactive maintenance is, reactive maintenance pros and cons, the different types of reactive maintenance, when and how to implement a reactive maintenance methodology, and the difference between reactive and proactive approaches to maintenance. 

 

Contents:

  1. What is Reactive Maintenance?
  2. Reactive Maintenance Pros and Cons 
  3. Types of Reactive Maintenance
  4. When is Reactive Maintenance appropriate?
  5. How to implement a strategy that includes Reactive Maintenance effectively 
  6. How to manage a Reactive Maintenance strategy
  7. The Role of a Facilities Manager in Reactive Maintenance
  8. Reactive Maintenance vs Proactive Maintenance

 

What is Reactive Maintenance?

Reactive maintenance approaches address repair and maintenance needs as they arise, without pre-scheduled plans. The term reactive can be used interchangeably with response. 

It's the "if it ain't broke don't fix it" approach, where actions are taken only after a failure has been detected or identified as likely to happen (the flickering light bulb scenario). This strategy is straightforward but comes with a set of challenges and considerations.

 

 

Reactive Maintenance Pros and Cons

Reactive maintenance does have more cons than pros, but it certainly can have its place within a maintenance strategy. 

Pros:

  • Short-term cost Savings: By avoiding regular checks which commits resources, a reactive approach offers upfront savings on maintenance costs.
  • Simplicity: Without the need for elaborate planning, it can be easier to manage in smaller operations with limited personnel. 
  • Practical for certain assets: For e.g. low value, non critical, or single-use assets such as light bulbs. 
  • Better than nothing: Suitable for environments where maintenance requirements are hard to predict or enforce.

Cons:

  • Legal repercussions: Adopting  a reactive approach to maintenance of certain assets opens up a Facilities Manager or Property Owner to substantial legal repercussions. Maintenance engineers and contractors are not legally responsible for the work they do, they are only bound by the rules of the contract they sign with a Facilities Manager or Property Owner. For this reason, it's essential to be fully aware of your compliance obligations (both statutory and mandatory), and factor those obligations into your maintenance plan and any contract you draw up to carry out maintenance works.
  • Costs of unexpected downtime: This is especially critical for assets in production-driven or service-led facilities. The cost of unexpected downtime typically far exceeds the cost of asset replacement, a lose-lose situation.
  • Increased energy consumption: Inadequately maintained assets have been proven to use more energy, which apart from wasting money can also cause damage to the asset and reduce lifespan.
  • Costs more in the long run: It is likely to cost more to conduct emergency repairs on an asset than it does to simply maintain it because sourcing labour and part replacements in an emergency time frame is extremely costly. So whilst you might have saved money initially, the long-term cost will come back to bite you.
  • Safety concerns: Delayed maintenance can pose safety risks, particularly in critical systems.
  • Reduced asset lifespan: Running an asset to failure can drastically shorten its lifespan.  A proactive maintenance plan can optimise the working life of an asset, leading to long-term cost savings. The amount of embodied carbon involved as a result of asset replacement decreases too because you replace assets less frequently.

 

 

Types of Reactive Maintenance 

When dealing with unplanned maintenance activities, there are a number of activities or approaches that are regularly adopted or talked about. There are 4 main types of reactive maintenance approaches:

Emergency Maintenance

Emergency maintenance is when an asset breaks down that either threatens life or property or is critical to the operation of a business.  Often, it only involves "making safe" the asset or issue. Further maintenance tasks may be involved to reinstate the asset and any consequential damage. 

Example:

A heating pipe bursts. The primary issue is the loss of heating within the space, but there is likely to be a secondary issue of water damage within or below the space. The emergency task may be to turn the water flow off in the heating system and prevent any further damage. If the responder does not have the right size pipework when they attend, then a follow-up maintenance task would be required to address the primary issue. A further maintenance task of repairing or replacing fabric damaged by the water may also need to be carried out.

Breakdown Maintenance

Breakdown maintenance is maintenance performed on equipment that has become unusable or inoperable. It is based on a trigger event occurring or being reported, and may be either planned or unplanned. Depending on the criticality of the asset, such an unexpected incident could force a business to bring in costly out-of-hours engineers to fix the issue or even replace the asset altogether. It may involve multiple tasks to bring the asset back into full service. Emergency maintenance may form a subset of a breakdown maintenance approach. 

Example:

An HVAC system breaks down in a commercial kitchen. Kitchen ventilation systems are critical to the safe and legal functioning of a commercial kitchen, keeping employees safe from airborne particles that cause respiratory problems. If the kitchen cannot be ventilated, it cannot operate.

Profit margins are very slim in the hospitality sector, meaning restaurants cannot afford any critical asset downtime. This would force the business to call in expensive out-of-hours engineers to fix the problem overnight in order to not miss a day of business.

Run-to-Failure Maintenance

Technically, any strategy that accepts reactive maintenance has adopted a "Run-to-Failure" policy, because assets are intentionally ran until they fail or partially fail. However, the proper use of the term refers to an approach where the conditional probability of failure remains low over time and the criticality of the failure is also low. This is where run-to-failure differs from breakdown maintenance - to run an asset until failure is a deliberate decision, whilst an unexpected breakdown is not. The action for a run-to-failure approach is usually the complete replacement of an asset. 

Example:

The classic example is non-emergency lighting. Failure of a lamp is unlikely to cause threat to life or have a significant impact on productivity, and the cost of access is disproportionate to its unit replacement cost. There is no maintenance activity required to optimise its life, rather it's just replaced once it fails. 

Corrective Maintenance

Corrective maintenance can be a catch-all expression to cover a reactive task. It's sometimes used to describe a task where a total breakdown has not occurred, but there may be partial failure which can cause the asset to become inoperable until corrected or reduced in efficiency. 

In real terms, it is a task that is initiated when an additional risk or issue has been discovered during a separate activity. Invariably, a corrective maintenance task is a planned activity rather than an unplanned activity. 

Example:

A pipe bursts in a plumbing system in an office let, flooding a toilet and necessitating an urgent visit from the plumber.  As previously described, this is likely to require an emergency maintenance task to stop the leak. Once this is done, there may be a corrective maintenance task to replace the pipework and return the toilet back to full operation. There may also be a requirement to repair/replace any fabric that has been damaged by water, however this may not need to be done straight away as it wouldn't impact the operational function and is more of an aesthetic issue (unless there is the hazard of mould involved). If the asset does not immediately need to be repaired or replaced, this is known as deferred corrective maintenance. 

 

When is Reactive Maintenance appropriate?

Waiting for assets to fail isn't universally applicable but serves well under specific conditions. Being proactive with maintenance minimises risks of failure, however it will not always prevent risks turning into issues. Taking a reactive approach is best for:

  • Urgent Repairs: When something breaks and poses an immediate risk or could cost you big time, it's reactive maintenance to the rescue.
  • Non-critical, low-priced assets: For assets that are easier and cheaper to replace than maintain, this approach is often best as long as proactive maintenance is not a legal requirement. Again, think lightbulbs.
  • Plan Z: If you've exhausted all other options and the asset does not have statutory (legally required) maintenance tasks attached to it and it is not cost-effective to access it regularly, then a reactive approach is better than nothing. 

 

 

How to implement a strategy that includes Reactive Maintenance effectively 

For certain assets, reactive maintenance is not just inevitable but also practical. Implementing it effectively, however, requires strategic thinking:

  • Comprehensive Asset Inventory: Knowing what assets you have and their impact on operations helps prioritise which can be left to a reactive strategy - this forms part of Business Focused Maintenance (BFM). 
  • Efficient Response Systems: Having the right tools, parts, and labour on hand for quick fixes reduces downtime.
  • Data-Driven Insights: Collecting data on repairs and failures can highlight patterns, allowing you to predict asset failure (also known as Reliability Centred Maintenance or RCM) and evolve to a more proactive maintenance strategy.

 

 

How to manage a Reactive Maintenance strategy

Although it's likely not your first option, sometimes you may have no choice but to employ a strategy that involves reactive maintenance for certain assets that don't have statutory requirements. If you are going to employ a reactive maintenance approach, here's how to do it smartly:

  • Know What's Key: Figure out which assets you really can't do without and focus on those.
  • Be Ready to React: Have a team or trade staff ready to jump on problems fast.
  • Keep Good Records: Know your assets inside and out to speed up fixes.
  • Build Strong Partnerships: Have go-to people for quick repairs.
  • Train Your Team: A skilled crew can tackle unexpected issues more efficiently.
  • Invest in Tools: The right equipment can make fixes faster and easier.

 

 

The Role of a Facilities Manager in Reactive Maintenance

Most Facilities Managers will employ reactive maintenance approaches as part of a wider maintenance strategy. To effectively employ a reactive maintenance approach, a Facilities Manager must:

  • Use Resources Wisely: Facilities Managers must make informed decisions to address the most pressing issues first.
  • Effective Leadership: A good leader stays on top of their team during an event which requires reactive maintenance. Such events often require teams to respond out-of-hours, so it's important to maintain morale and motivation to ensure repairs are carried out in a timely and efficient manner.
  • Communication: Nobody likes being in the dark, especially when things break down. A great Facilities Manager keeps everyone informed about what’s broken, how long the fix will take and what to expect next.
  • Always Improving: After every quick fix, they're looking into what went wrong and how to stop it from happening again. Continuous improvement is their mantra for fewer emergencies down the line.

 

 

Reactive Maintenance vs Proactive Maintenance

The key difference between reactive maintenance and proactive maintenance is that a reactive maintenance approach waits for an asset to fail while proactive techniques mitigate risk and attempt to address the most likely underlying cause of failure to prevent an asset from breaking down in the first place.

Choosing the Right Strategy

Choosing how to keep your facility running smoothly is key. This involves understanding the specific needs, risks and operational priorities of your facility. A blend of reactive and proactive strategies often represents the most balanced approach, optimising both costs and operational reliability.

However, it's important to bear in mind that no one-size-fits-all here. Think about what's critical in your facility, your budget and what tools you've got. While reactive maintenance may suffice for non-critical assets with lower repair costs, proactive maintenance strategies offer a more balanced approach for ensuring reliability and reduce the risk of unexpected failures. It's ideal for critical assets where the costs of failure are high.

A Shout Out to Facilities Managers

Understanding the role and scope of reactive maintenance is the first step toward mastering facility management. The journey toward facilities excellence however involves exploring more comprehensive strategies that balance immediate needs with long-term goals, such as achieving financial stability, sustainability, compliance and operational efficiency.

At SFG20, we understand the challenges of developing and maintaining a practical maintenance plan composed of tens, hundreds or even thousands of individual assets and building elements, and so our team want to offer you as much as our guidance at possible.

To find out more about how to implement a blended maintenance strategy, we recommend watching our free "How To Balance Your Maintenance Strategy For Optimal Return" webinar ran by industry experts.