Grenfell -The symptoms vs the disease - a solution

The simple solution to addressing regulation and enforcement does not requires rafts of legislation (except perhaps in fire safety), but the simple enforcement of simplified regulations, which are designed to give us a safe, healthy built environment that we can enjoy in a sustainable way.  For this to work Building Regulations and Planning Consents need to be matched to output, not theoretical models as they currently are.  In other words, the process should be about what you actually deliver, not what you promised to deliver.

At the BESA, we are encouraged by the broader focus of this review and its focus on tall buildings, compliance and enforcement. Dame Judith’s appointment is significant, showing the government appreciate the importance of engineering expertise to undertake a review of this nature. As an active fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering, and with her track record at the Health and Safety Executive, BESA is encouraged by the appointment and looks forward to supporting the review as it gets underway.

For Part L of Building Regulations, which deals with the conservation of fuel and power for example, this would mean instead of complicated SAP and SBEM modelling, the requirement would be to meet a notional energy and carbon target per square meter.  How you achieve that would be up to you as the expert designer, but you would be required to prove that you had met the target or produce an explanation of why you had not.

Someone with an engineering background, like Dame Judith, will understand what changes can be made for the future and how to make the regulations more effective.

Who will enforce it?  Not the DCLG’s “buildings police”, but the freeholder of the property.  They would be required to prove that the building meets the requirements of building and planning regulations and the local authority could audit a small percentage.  The same principle that HMRC employ, with crippling fines for those who try to cheat the system.

We may see a future where freeholders would need to employ professional experts to carry out this task on their behalf and at their own expense. You would also have to allow scope for those who genuinely innovate and fail (not with safety of course) but otherwise you place the emphasis and responsibility where it should lie; with the freeholder.

Extra Cost?

Before we throw our hands up in horror at the additional expense, they are not being asked to do anything they are not already required to – but don’t.  Surely, they intend to build the thing they put in for planning?  You wouldn’t dream of getting in an aircraft that had not been tested, so why would you live or work in an untested building, when you spend over 80% of your time inside?

Our built environment has huge impact on our society, the buildings and places we construct will be there for years.  A couple of thousand pounds saved by a developer or a contractor in the short term can have huge costs long term for all of us when it comes to health, safety and economics. With 455 towers planned for London alone, the focus will be on these buildings but the same issues apply to our schools (witness the recent Edinburgh Schools’ closures because of structural safety concerns) our hospitals, offices and homes. 

We have seen countless reports on the ills of the construction industry, going all the way back to the Simon Report in 1944.  Almost all focus on dealing with the symptoms and not the disease. Talk of collaboration, a digital revolution and innovation will all help, but to fix this we need to start with the disease.  We need to be building an entire product, not just assembling a collection of individual products. The freeholder has to want a complete product that meets design, complies with regulations and planning requirements and must have responsibility to deliver that to the population at large.

We all live in the built environment, so is it unreasonable to ask freeholders to be responsible for making sure they enhance that environment through sustainable, safe development?

The responsibility to ensure the compliance of the building with the required standards lies with the builder who should have in place proper inspection of the works, however by definition such self-managed inspections cannot be independent of the builder.

With the launch of Dame Judith’s new independent review, we are finally going to have an open and frank discussion on the regulatory system around design, construction and on-going management of buildings. We can examine the related compliance and enforcement issues and we are ready to work together towards updated building regulations that are safer, more efficient and fit for purpose.

Recent News

BESA and SFG20 support the UK BIM Alliance

The Building Engineering Services Association (BESA) and its widely used facilities management solution SFG20 have become affiliates of the UK BIM Alliance.

Link Continue Reading

NBS and BESA partner to join-up digital construction - Mapping Uniclass 2015 to SFG20

NBS, the leading specification platform for the construction industry, has announced its partnership with BESA (Building Engineering Services Association) to help drive digital adoption throughout the building lifecycle.

Link Continue Reading


The coronavirus crisis has created unprecedented challenges for building owners and maintainers.

Link Continue Reading

Coronavirus forces new dates for Facilities Show

Facilities Show 2020 which was originally scheduled to be staged in May 2020, will now be held at ExCeL London on 8–10 September 2020.

Link Continue Reading

Grenfell - less speed more haste - when will we learn?

Part 6 of our Grenfell series questions whether the construction teams’ views were listened to.

Link Continue Reading

Grenfell- flues, chimneys and exhausts - installation and maintenance

Part 5 of our series moves onto a key part of a passive fire safety strategy; flues and exhausts.

Link Continue Reading

Grenfell - the symptoms vs the disease

Part 3 of the series looks at what options there are around regulations and enforcement.

Link Continue Reading

Grenfell - fire stopping systems

Part 2 of our Grenfell series - What else are we missing - looks at fire stopping systems.

Link Continue Reading

Grenfell - what else are we missing?

Part 1 of our series outlines the fire risks associated with the poor cleaning of ventilation systems.

Link Continue Reading

SFG20 launches approved provider scheme

SFG20 has launched an Approved Provider Partnership and welcomes its first company to gain approved provider status Asckey Data Services Ltd.

Link Continue Reading

Industry bodies agree single process for BIM product data

Three leading construction industry bodies have moved to clear up growing confusion over the process of standardising product information for use in Building Information Modelling (BIM).

Link Continue Reading

Industry bodies agree standard for catering maintenance

SFG20 in collaboration with CESA has launched the first ever independently verified standard for the planned maintenance of catering equipment.

Link Continue Reading

Energy efficiency could cut NHS costs by £400m

Good news for the health sector in the wake of the Carter Report as a HTM (Health Technical Memorandum) module is now available, providing maintenance schedules aligned with the requirements of the HTMs.

Link Continue Reading

70% of office workers complain about poor air quality

A new survey has found that indoor air pollution is prevalent in work places across Britain, potentially causing long-term health problems.

Link Continue Reading

SFG20 now includes schedules relating to specialist areas such as catering

26/11/2015 From today, Customiser Compliance and Service Model subscribers can access a range of Specialist Schedules covering catering, lifts & access equipment and workshop equipment.

Link Continue Reading

SFG20's Bruce Kirton presents on the importance of planned maintenance strategies

20/10/2015 Visit CIBSE's Building Performance Conference on November 3rd and 4th to hear about the benefits a planned maintenance strategy can deliver to your business.

Link Continue Reading

Primary users can now set various access rights for different users

22.07.2015 From today, Primary Users at both Customiser Compliance and Service Model levels can assign access rights to users.

Link Continue Reading

Service Model subscribers can now customise service times

24.04.15 Today we are excited to announce the launch of customisable service times for our Service Model subscribers.

Link Continue Reading

New Service Model functionality and customer website now live

12/01/2015 A streamlined user interface for Service Model users has gone live today, in addition to a new-look customer website.

Link Continue Reading

Service times now added for Service Model subscribers

1/12/14 Schedules now display the end-to-end service time to complete the tasks on an individual maintenance schedule.

Link Continue Reading

SFG20 wins government grant to develop a BIM interface

11/08/14 Enabling the automatic generation of customised maintenance solutions from BIM models and informing whole-life design decisions, with collaboration between construction and facilities management teams.

Link Continue Reading

SFG20 wins at the prestigious 2013 H&V News Awards

26/04/2013 SFG20 won in the Service and Maintenance Initiative of the Year category, being judged as "innovative" and having the potential to transform the service and maintenance sector.

Link Continue Reading